| 9/11 ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION |
|
| DEMANDS CLEANUP NOW !!!!! NOT COVERUP !!!!! |
Had an Interview with the WTC Health Registry?
What was it like?
Please send us your comments.
Or, if you are expecting the interview call,
the comments below may help you prepare:
Below are accounts written by people who have been interviewed by the World Trade Center Health Registry. Please send your account of your experience of being interviewed for the WTC HR to info@911ea.org Include such information as the date, the location of your interviewer (NYC or North Carolina), the total time of your interview, and what questions you thought were problematical. Especially important are the ways the questions fail to capture the type of exposure you or your child may have had after 9/11/01. We encourage you to insist that the interviewer take down additional information about ongoing exposures to indoor dust, and other exposures which you may not be asked about. The many flaws in this survey (and its limited funding) may mean that its findings will not be scientifically valid. We hope that gathering accounts will make it possible to demonstrate some of the problems the public is encountering. Finally, please feel free to include any advice you wish to offer others! All submissions are subject to some minimal editing. Your last name and E-mail address will be included only at your request.
| ........ I did the
registry today for my daughter who is in high school. Don't bother to register
yourself unless you were there on 9/11 or worked on the clean-up, since you won't qualify.
I think this outside company is not such a great idea - Although the questioner was very
polite and helpful he could not pronounce the name of the school -- and there were other
silly things like that -- since he was from North Carolina. That kind of unfamiliarity may
be an impediment. Also, they ask specific health questions which you are required mostly
to answer from a list of multiple choice answers that don't always fit your answer. I thought
of another thing. I had to write down what I told him so that in 2 years when it is my
daughter's turn to respond (over 18, they do it, under 18 you do it by proxy as parent)
she will know the stuff I remember about her that she will not- eg, eye irritation, throat
irritation, all that stuff that happened earlier on- and some silly one time things that I
remember, like a weird rash in March........
One more thing, he mentioned a confirmation number and then never gave it. It can be used to follow up with something you forgot, for example. And since I was supposed to add ss#, now I don't know how to get back to them to add it. I guess I can simply call when I get some time. Here are a few more important points to keep in mind when answering the survey. The questions focus on physical injuries and such that took place on 9/11 and on whether you worked on the pile. I added as a note (you can make a point to do this if any category does not ask about your stuff) that my kid spent time in the school next to the barge operation with the trucks transferring the debris all hours back and forth and spewing the dust without protection, and etc. They have no questions which match that risk factor. I did NOT remember to mention the fact that the school ventilation was not cleaned until July 2002. They have no questions relating to school children's experience, the barge operation from October 2001-June 2003 and uncleaned areas in the schools. When I follow up to give in her SS# I will try to add that tidbit also. I really think that it is important for each of us to add those 2 points as our own risk factors which they do not include, i.e., the barge operation next to school and uncleaned ventilation system. They do ask the date of return- which was October 9. I believe the whole effort is still worth....... doing, just to make sure that your kid's name is listed for future reference, since nobody else is collecting it. It took about 30 minutes to do, but was not difficult or anything. Also, watch out for mental health questions- some stuff you may not know the answers to unless you have all the details from your child for Sept. 11th --- and the interviewers do ask what they saw very specifically, pretty gory for me even though I did not experience it first hand and simply had to recount her tale. If you have not discussed these things with your child, you will not be prepared.-- Lori, parent of Stuyvesant student, Sept. 20, 2003 |
| DOH called this evening for
the interview. They said I couldn't speak on behalf of my kid, then changed their
mind and did the interview with me. Asked if he was south of Chambers on 911. I said he
was ON Chambers. This was too complicated for them: was he south of Chambers? Interviewer wanted to know his social security number and income but didn't mind being given the brush. When it was over they asked if they could contact him in the future. I said, No. Could they put other agencies in touch with him? No. What is his email address? -- Jenna, parent of Stuyvesant student, September 23, 2003 |
| Oiy. I have just gotten off
the phone with the Registry following up on my on-line registration.. A very polite
and "slow" young man informed me that he was in a room with about 20 other guys
in NY, that there was another call center in the Carolinas and that the interview would
take about 30 minutes... let's see, that's 20 guys for 8 hours doing 2 calls an hour. that
is 320 x' 2 (the one in N. Carolina.) That means they can complete about 600 forms a
day... Of course my interview took longer because he kept having to go ask his supervisor questions. Throughout the interview this very sweet and cooperative young man kept reiterating the boundaries. The questions were for north of Chambers and Canal Streets. The "site" is the pile and includes Rector Street. The 1st questions are very specifically confined to 9/11 and GZ. Then the questions get broken out into 12-18 and 18-24 SEPT (can't remember dates- but less than a week.) If I had not persisted I would not have gotten registered because they were looking for affiliations and I had trouble getting him to find the box for unaffiliated. ALSO they were looking for "shift" data [morning, night, or graveyard] not appropriate to "good Samaritans". I would have to guess that if I did not speak English and I did not have a specific mission to see what this was about. I would have presumed myself ineligible from the start and given up. The short northern border (Chambers) is of concern.* -- Diane, Oct. 7, 2003 |
| *Editors' note: To
be eligible, office workers and visitors to the area had to be below Chambers Street on
September 11. Students and staff (pre K-12) or younger ones in day care had to be south of
Canal on 9/11. The only groups that could have been anywhere on 9/11 and
still be eligible are residents living south of Canal on 9/11, and workers and volunteers
involved in rescue and recovery operations. We are concerned that the fact that office workers (a huge population) had to be south of Chambers on 9/11, as opposed to south of Canal like school children and personnel, or absent from the area on 9/11 but re-occupants of buildings like residents, could seriously skew the numbers towards health effects that were caused by exposure to the plume as opposed to indoor contamination. |
|
|
| I did the WTC Registry Phone
interview on Saturday and I was very disappointed in the content and the format of the
questions. You had to choice one answer from a multiple choice and my responses don't
always neatly fit into the given choices. Also, 6x as much on mental as
physical/environmental. So our home is in the WTC immediate zone, so am I a first
responder? Confusing... although we didn't move back in till Jan. 2002 I was at home
cleaning up/organizing/fixing almost every school day making our home liveable so that we
could. They ask whether the children saw anyone jumping, but not whether they saw the big
cloud or whether they saw the WTC ruins or the firemen raking the rubble or the people of
uniform lining up..... It's apparent that there was no WTC resident involved in the making
of the questionnaire. -- annonymous, November 5, 2003 |